JLF keynoter Amartya Sen |
After hearing from Amartya Sen twice on the opening day of JLF, I tweeted that India ought to declare him a living national treasure, as the Japanese do for some of its greatest artists and thinkers. I wasn’t kidding. Of course, there could be a down side to such an act, as he seems now on permanent loan the U.S. as a professor at Harvard (and take that, Cambridge!), and perhaps he’d be called back to India full time. In any event, he’s a cosmopolitan man and a real gem. He comes across as humble, generous, humorous, and brilliant. In his keynote address, he imagined a conversation with the “goddess of medium things” to ask seven wishes for India. I’ll share my notes about those wishes below. Indians and the rest of the world would do well to keep them constantly in mind:
1.
Sen asks for a renewed concern for classical education
and the humanities. In his interview during a later session, this Nobel
prize-winning economist told his audience that he studied Sanskrit and
mathematics in college. If you read a book like The Argumentative Indian, his collection of essays about India, you
appreciate his knowledge of India that extends back into the classical era.
Against this, India is awash in engineers and IT guys without such grounding. A
new balance is needed. Sen mentioned that Tagore (whose school Sen attended)
emphasized the need for science education. Now the positions are reversed. By
the way, I’ll make the same wish for America and the rest of the world.
2.
Sen wishes for a pro-business party on the right that
is not associated with communalism (which we Americans would consider a
religious or ethnic party). While not mentioned by name, he probably was thinking
of the BJP, the Hindu nationalist party that scares non-Hindu Indians (and
there are millions of them, mostly Muslim). But like the Republican Party in
the U.S., it is an amalgam of business interests and voters who believe that
they can advance only if someone else gets trampled upon. In the U.S., white
men tend to vote Republican although Republican policies favor plutocrats over
working people. So, again, I’ll take Sen’s wish to the U.S. with me.
3.
Sen wishes for a stronger party on the Left, one
genuinely concerned for the severely deprived (millions in India) and not
chasing the boogieman of “American imperialism”. I got a good chuckle out of
this comment, as I believe that he was making an oblique reference to The
(Khodograbe) Arrest. More than one commentator about that affair noted that the
old guard in India still wants to man the barricades with the old Marxist
rhetoric of anti-imperialism. The young, I think, look upon this as so much
nonsense, although as with many of the young, you can expect a strong
nationalist streak. In any event, the really poor should be the concern of the
Left according to Sen. I say ditto for the U.S. If the Democrats have any concern
for the poor (and they do have—some, they are ahead of the Republicans, but
that’s not saying much at all. Both the Left
in India and Democrats in the
U.S. are too beholden to wealthy donors and middle-class interests to do what’s
really best for the really poor, but Sen’s next suggestion addresses this
problem.
4.
Sen wishes for a better media. The media must overcome
its reluctance to investigate and reveal abuses that strike close established
interests, such as subsidies for petroleum and electricity that mainly benefit
the wealthy and middle-class and that do little for the really poor. The really
poor don’t have access or much use for electricity or much in the way of
petroleum. The media conveniently ignores these abuses of the public purse. Sen
wants to see subsidies ended and funds directed to health care, immunizations,
infrastructure, and other public goods. Sen suggests that funds are best spent
for better schools, better higher education, toilets for all, and gender
equality, among other things. While economic growth has allowed some improvements
in each of these areas, economic growth without a political sector that
provides for public goods will fail to allow for the improvement of everyone’s
life. For models, Sen suggests that India look to the East Asians (whom, I must
say, have left India behind).
5.
Sen asks for an end to the criminalization of
homosexuality, a vestige of mid-19th century British attitudes. (Here
is one area in which the U.S. has made some very real gains and seems well
underway to ending this discrimination.) \
6.
Sen asks for an improvement in the political culture of
India and a better recognition of issues. He, like many, is heartened that
corruption has become a political issue. Improved governance is a good that
needs reinforcement and that can aid in many other causes, such as the
eradication of polio and improvements in the condition of women.
7.
Sen requests that India become less “defeatist”. I
would say “fatalist”, but the intention is the same. Far too often I perceive that
Indians take a “what’ya gonna do?” attitude. But I believe—and hope—that demonstrations
and elections in Delhi and elsewhere
about corruption and the abuse of women indicate a new activism that might lead
India to address its many failures of governance. Of course, we in the U.S.
take too much for granted, and for every “gov’ment can’t do nothing right”
yahoo in the U.S. I meet, I’d like to bring them to India and say: “Here’s what it looks like with little or no
effective government”. What unreconstructed Indian lefties and American
anti-government types don’t ponder enough is why Indians emigrate to the U.S. (and
U.K. and Australia) and not vice versa. It’s all a package, and right now
Indian’s package of opportunities and goods remains far short of that of the
U.S. and even China. However, if India grants Amartya Sen his seven wishes—as only
Indians and not the goddess can—then watch out, India could stand astride the
world stage.
No comments:
Post a Comment